Contact Us | Search Contact Us UVa Search
IPM Banner IPM Banner IPM Banner UVA Banner
 
 

PERIODIC CELLULAR MATERIALS:
MANUFACTURING


The applications of periodic cellular metals (PCM) can be only realized if affordable fabrication routes exist for the metal alloys of interest. Numerous solid sheet forming, perforated sheet folding/drawing, wire assembly and investment casting methods are emerging for the shaping of the topologies discussed in the PERIODIC CELLULAR MATERIALS: TOPOLOGY section. Numerous ways for bonding these structures are also being developed including laser and other micro-welding techniques for steels, superalloys and many refractory metals, diffusion bonding for titanium alloys and transient liquid phase processes such as brazing for copper, stainless steel and some aluminum alloys.


Honeycomb Structures
Numerous approaches for making metallic honeycomb structures have been developed in the periodic cellular materials laboratory at the University of Virginia. Hexagonal honeycombs can be fabricated by an expansion manufacturing process, especially when the relative density is low, . In this process thin metal sheet is first cut into panels and strip bonded Figure 1. This process is referred to as the “honeycomb before expansion” or HOBE method. This can be cut and stretched perpendicular to the strip bonds to create a hexagonal structure. The expansion process requires moderately high inter-sheet bond strengths (sufficient to enable sheet stretching). For low density honeycombs with very thin webs, the required bond strengths are readily achievable with modern adhesives or by laser welding or diffusion bonding processes. However, as the web (sheet) thickness to cell size ratio increases (i.e. as the relative density increases) the force needed to stretch the metal sheets eventually approaches the inter-sheet bond fracture strength. The manufacture of higher relative density hexagonal honeycombs then requires the use of other manufacturing methods.

Figure 1: Schematic illustration of the honeycomb before expansion (HOBE) method of fabricating hexagonal cores.

Another approach based on a corrugation process is illustrated in Figure 2. In this approach, a metal sheet is corrugated, and then stacked into a block. The sheets are bonded by welding (or any suitable method) together and the core sliced to the desired thickness and the corrugated layers either adhesively bonded or welded to face sheets. Figure 2 shows the process for forming a hexagonal honeycomb core; however this process may be used for numerous additional topologies including square and triangular shaped cells

Figure 2: Schematic illustration of the corrugation method of fabricating hexagonal cores.

In a third approach, slotted metal strips can be assembled in the form of square and triangular honeycombs, Fig. 3. Since no metal bending is required, this slotted sheet process is also well suited for making honeycombs from low ductility materials. The honeycomb cores are bonded by welding/brazing (or any suitable method) together and bonded to face sheets to form a sandwich structure. Even brittle composite or ceramic honeycombs can in principle be made by this approach.


Figure 3: Schematic illustration of the slotted metal strip approach of fabricating square and triangular honeycomb cores.


Prismatic Topologies
Prismatic topology structures can be manufactured by sheet bending or progressive rolling operations, Fig. 4, or by extrusion techniques. The corrugation approach is often preferred for low relative density structures made from alloys with high formability. Triangular, flat-topped, square or sinusoidal corrugations can all be fabricated by this approach. The flat topped structures have steeper webs than their triangular counterparts making them a preferred topology for many structural applications. The corrugated sheets can be stacked either collinearly or in a cross ply manner and then bonded by similar techniques to those used to make honeycombs.

Figure 4: Schematic illustration of the corrugation method of fabricating flat-topped prismatic cores.

Lattice Truss Structures
Lattice truss topology structures can be made by investment casting, perforated metal sheet forming, wire/hollow tube lay-up or by snap fitting laser cut out lattices. All but the investment casting approach require assembly and bonding steps to create the cellular structure and for later attaching it to face sheets.

Investment Casting
Investment casting begins with the creation of a wax or polymer pattern of the lattice truss structure (and face sheets). The patterns for the lattices used in flat panel structures can be made by injection molding. Those for complex shaped objects can be made by rapid prototyping methods. The truss and face sheet pattern is then attached to a system of liquid metal gates, runners and risers that are made from a casting wax and coated with a ceramic casting slurry. The pattern is removed and the empty (negative) pattern filled with liquid metal, Fig. 5. After solidification the ceramic is removed, the gates and runners are removed, and the component is inspected to ensure that complete liquid metal infiltration has occurred and that casting porosity has not compromised structural integrity.

Figure 5: Investment casting method of fabricating lattice truss sandwich structures.

In principle, the investment casting approach can be used to fabricate complex, non-planar shaped structures of significant size (1 – 5 m) and weight (up to several hundred kilograms). Structures made from high fluidity casting alloys such as Al-Si, Cu-Be and some super alloys have all been made this way. Most have relatively high core relative densities (> 10%), a consequence of the difficulty of reliably filling molds containing very small diameter, high aspect ratio (truss) channels. Periodic cellular metals with lower relative densities are better suited for fabrication from a wide variety of structural alloys using sheet or wire forming methods.


Sheet Forming Methods
The folding of a perforated or expanded metal sheet provides a simple means to make lattice trusses. A variety of die stamping, laser or water jet cutting methods can be used to cut patterns into metal sheets. For example, a tetrahedral lattice truss can be made by folding a hexagonally perforated sheet in such a way that alternate nodes are displaced in and out of the sheet plane as shown in Fig. 6. By starting with a diamond perforation, a similar process can be used to make a pyramidal lattice.


Figure 6: Punch and die forming of perforated sheet for fabricating lattice truss cores.

There is considerable waste material created during the perforation of the sheets used to create low relative density lattices and this contributes significantly to the cost of making cellular materials this way. These costs can be greatly reduced by the use of either clever folding techniques that more efficiently utilize the sheet material or methods for creating perforation patterns that do not result in material waste. Figure 7 shows an example of the use of metal expansion techniques, followed by folding, that provides a means for creating lattice truss topologies with little or no waste.

Figure 7: Folding of expanded metal sheets for fabricating lattice truss cores.

Mesh and Wire Forming Methods
The weaving and braiding of metallic wires provides a simple, inexpensive means for controlling the placement of metal trusses. It is applicable to any alloy that can be drawn into wire. Plain weave (0/90°) fabrics are the simplest to envision. The included angle (normally 90°) can be modified after weaving by shearing the fabric and a wide range of cell width to fiber diameter ratios are available. Cellular structures are made from these metal textiles by simply stacking and bonding layers of the fabric. The best structures are achieved by aligning the layers so that the nodes of adjacent layers are in contact, Fig. 8. Sandwich panels can be fabricated from these cores with the wires oriented at any angle to the face sheet normal by a transient liquid phase bonding process.

Figure 8: Folding of expanded metal sheets for fabricating lattice truss cores.

Lattice truss structures with similar topologies to textiles can be fabricated by a wire or tube lay up process followed by transient liquid phase bonding, node fusion welding or diffusion. Using a slotted tool to control wire spacing and orientation it is a simple matter to lay down collinear wires and to alternate the direction of successive layers, Fig. 9. This procedure results in square or diamond lattice truss topologies that can be machined and bonded to face sheets. The approach has a number of attractions. Compared to the textile approach, it is more straightforward to maintain the cell alignment throughout the structure at low relative densities. Moreover, hollow tubes can be used instead of solid wires and this enables very low-density lattices to be achieved and truss compressive buckling strengths to be increased by increasing the trusses moment of inertia.

Figure 9: Wire and tube lay-up process for fabricating lattice truss cores.

Many processes are available to metallically bond honeycomb, prismatic and lattice truss structures from the sub assemblies described above. For titanium alloys diffusion bonding methods have been successfully developed. For other materials, electrical resistance, laser, friction stir and other common fusion welding methods can be used to assemble the structures.

For many stainless steels, super alloys, titanium, copper and some aluminum alloys, brazing methods can be used to fabricate periodic cellular lattices. Brazing usually involves coating (by dipping or spraying) the materials to be bonded with a melting temperature suppressing alloy dispersed in a binder/adhesive. For some materials, this can be applied as a thin clad layer to the sheets prior to their assembly into cellular structures. In other cases the brazing alloy is suspended as a powder in a sticky polymer resin and is applied by spraying. Numerous brazing alloy compositions have been developed for the various engineering alloy systems of interest.


© 2007 · Intelligent Processing of Materials Laboratory · Materials Science and Engineering Department
School of Engineering and Applied Sciences · University of Virginia